Digestibility of insect meals for Nile tilapia fingerlings

dc.creatorTáfanie Valácio Fontes
dc.creatorKátia Rodrigues Batista de de Oliveira
dc.creatorIzabella Luiza Gomes Almeida
dc.creatorTamira Maria Orlando
dc.creatorPaulo Borges Rodrigues
dc.creatorDiego Vicente da Costa
dc.creatorPriscila Vieira e Rosa
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-01T14:34:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:08:45Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01T14:34:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-29
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
dc.description.sponsorshipOutra Agência
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040181
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/47632
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofAnimals
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectAquicultura
dc.subjectTilápia (Peixe)
dc.subjectAlimentos não convencionais
dc.subjectSustentabilidade
dc.titleDigestibility of insect meals for Nile tilapia fingerlings
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage189
local.citation.issue4
local.citation.spage181
local.citation.volume9
local.description.resumoInsects are a valuable source of nutrients for fish, but little is known about their nutritional value for Nile tilapia fingerlings. To evaluate the nutritional value and energy apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of five insects for Nile Tilapia male fingerlings, 900 fish were distributed in 18 fiberglass conic tanks, in a completely randomized design, with six dietary treatments (control, Nauphoeta cinerea meal (NCM) (Blattodea), Zophobas morio larvae meal (ZMM) (Coleptera), Gromphadorhina portentosa meal (GPM) (Blattodea), Gryllus assimilis meal (GAM) (Orthoptera) and Tenebrio molitor larvae meal (TMM) (Coleptera)) and three replicates (tanks), each containing 50 fish. The control diet had no insect meal included and the other five treatments comprised 80% commercial diet and 20% test ingredient with 0.1% chromic oxide as an inert marker. TMM presented a higher ADC for dry matter, protein, corrected protein and chitin than to other treatments (p < 0.01). GPM presented the highest ADC for lipids (p < 0.01). In general, the TMM presented better ADC of nutrients and energy and all the insect meals evaluated are potential feed for Nile tilapia fingerlings.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentICA - INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/4/181

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Digestibility of insect meals for nile tilapia fingerlings.pdf
Tamanho:
255.9 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: