Comparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized trial

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorCristina Batista Miamoto
dc.creatorLeandro Silva Marques
dc.creatorLucas Guimarães Abreu
dc.creatorSaul Martins de Paiva
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T19:29:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:15:30Z
dc.date.available2023-07-05T19:29:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2319/052117-344.1
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/55841
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofThe Angle Orthodontist
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectMalocclusion
dc.subjectDentition, mixed
dc.subjectOrthodontics, interceptive
dc.subject.otherChild
dc.subject.otherMalocclusion
dc.subject.otherAnterior crossbite
dc.subject.otherMixed dentition
dc.subject.otherInterceptive orthodontics
dc.titleComparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized trial
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage150
local.citation.issue2
local.citation.spage144
local.citation.volume88
local.description.resumoObjective: To evaluate and compare two treatment protocols to correct anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition. Materials and Methods: Thirty children, 8–10 years of age, participated. Individuals were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 15 children treated with an upper removable appliance with finger springs; group 2, 15 children treated by bonding resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement bite pads on the lower first molars. The 30 participants were evaluated before treatment (T1) and 12 months after treatment began (T2). The variables evaluated included overjet, perimeter of the maxillary arch, intercanine distances in the maxilla and mandible, SNA, SNB, ANB, and U1.NA. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t-test and Student's t-test. Effect sizes and confidence intervals were also calculated. Results: Group 1 showed a significant increase in overjet (P < .001), intercanine distance in the maxilla (P = .006), intercanine distance in the mandible (P = .031), and U1.NA (P = .002). Group 2 showed a significant increase in overjet (P = .008), intercanine distance in the mandible (P = .005), and U1.NA (P < .001). For all the evaluated variables, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed between the two protocols: use of a removable maxillary biteplate with finger springs and bonding of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement bite pads on the lower first molars, for the correction of anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article/88/2/144/59147/Comparison-of-two-early-treatment-protocols-for

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Comparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition - a randomized trial.pdf
Tamanho:
134.93 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG