Mistaken perception of lipid intake and its effects: a randomized trial

dc.creatorMariana Carvalho de Menezes
dc.creatorSueli Aparecida Mingoti
dc.creatorRaquel de Deus Mendonça
dc.creatorAline Cristine Souza Lopes
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T14:36:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:27:43Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T14:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40795-017-0193-8
dc.identifier.issn2055-0928
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/65726
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Nutrition
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectEstudos de Intervenção
dc.subjectModelo Transteórico
dc.subjectComportamento Alimentar
dc.subjectLipídeos
dc.subject.otherIntervention studies
dc.subject.otherTranstheoretical model
dc.subject.otherStages of change
dc.subject.otherFeeding behavior
dc.subject.otherEating
dc.titleMistaken perception of lipid intake and its effects: a randomized trial
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.issue77
local.citation.volume3
local.description.resumoBackground: Although the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) is promising for behavioral interventions, it may be limited by an inability to understand perceptions of food consumption. The following questions and gaps presented by the scientific community prompted this study: What is the concordance between perceived and actual food consumption? What proportions of individuals are in the pseudo-maintenance (PM) stage (overly optimistic perception of fat consumption)? What is the proportion of individuals in the non-reflective action stages (adequate fat intake but do not recognize it)? Is it necessary to develop specific strategies for individuals in these stages? Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the proportion of “pseudo-respondents,” or those in the PM and non-reflective action stages, and to explore subgroup effects by PM classification. Methods: In a previously conducted randomized controlled trial, participants in the usual care group (UCG) and the TTM-intervention group (TM-IG) were post-hoc classified as “true respondents” or “pseudo-respondents”; the latter included those in the PM (mistakenly perceived their lipid intake as adequate) or non-reflective action (did not recognize the adequacy of their lipid intake) stage. The 6-month TTM-based intervention for fat consumption was performed with a sample of Public Health Service users. Results: Seventy-one women completed all of the phases. About half of the participants were in the PM stage (UCG: 14 of 31; TM-IG: 19 of 40), and only two were in the non-reflective action stage. Post-intervention, PM individuals in the TM-IG evolved differently, with greater progression to later stages of change and reduced calorie intake, weight, and body mass index (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Owing to the high proportion of participants in the PM stage and the differing performance, this stage is important. The intervention had a previously unreported differential effect on the progression of the stage of change and nutritional status by PM classification.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-7959
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3416-4014
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-2606
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentENF - DEPARTAMENTO DE ENFERMAGEM APLICADA
local.publisher.departmentENF - DEPARTAMENTO DE NUTRIÇÃO
local.publisher.departmentICX - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTATÍSTICA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://bmcnutr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40795-017-0193-8

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Mistaken perception of lipid intake and its effects_ a randomized trial.pdf
Tamanho:
487.43 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format