The complexity and contradictions of the right to refuse to do hazardous work in the surgical center of a hospital

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorDaniel de Souza Costa Calvo
dc.creatorJoão Alberto Ferreira
dc.creatorDaisy Moreira Cunha
dc.creatorDavidson Passos Mendes
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-10T19:52:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:13:58Z
dc.date.available2023-11-10T19:52:32Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-25
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/wor-210073
dc.identifier.issn1875-9270
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/60790
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofWork: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectAssistência hospitalar
dc.subjectErgonomia
dc.subject.otherRight to refuse
dc.subject.otherWork activity
dc.subject.otherHospital care
dc.subject.otherErgonomics
dc.subject.otherErgology
dc.titleThe complexity and contradictions of the right to refuse to do hazardous work in the surgical center of a hospital
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage10
local.citation.issue3
local.citation.spage1
local.citation.volume71
local.description.resumoBACKGROUND: The topic right to refuse to do hazardous work/to be exposed to serious and imminent risks is herein presented as the central and fundamental axis on issues associated with workers’ health and safety. OBJECTIVE: Investigating how the topic right to refuse to do hazardous work/be exposed to serious and imminent risks may be used as condition and strategy to manage work in the Surgical Center of a hospital. METHODS: The research methodology focused on establishing dialogue among Activity-centered Ergonomics (Ergonomic Workplace Analysis –EWA), Ergology, Action-Research and Ethnography. Samples were collected from March to September 2018 and comprised 120 hours of data, in total. The Surgical Center of the investigated hospital was the place of choice to conduct the study. Assistive Nurses accounting for managing and operating the entire sector were the analyzed population. RESULTS: The concept of refusal was expanded and (re)signified beyond the workers’ health and safety perspective, since it was also linked to variables such as environment, quality of products/processes and social accountability. CONCLUSIONS: Refusal does not only mean not doing what is requested, but performing the task requested by other means and paths that are always guided by one’s commitment to achieve the overall proposed productive outcomes. The right to refuse is more than a management tool, it is a broad and effective work organization strategy.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-5303
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0421-6138
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0702-8132
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-9960
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAE - DEPARTAMENTO DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO ESCOLAR
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor210073

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG