Rotary instrument or piezoelectric for the removal of third molars: a meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorRafael Alvim Magesty
dc.creatorEndi Lanza Galvão
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martins
dc.creatorCássio Roberto Rocha dos Santos
dc.creatorSaulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T17:24:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T22:56:07Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T17:24:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0938-y
dc.identifier.issn0974-942X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/63284
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectMolar, third
dc.subjectSurgery, oral
dc.subjectPiezosurgery
dc.subject.otherThird molar
dc.subject.otherOral surgery
dc.subject.otherPiezoeletric surgery
dc.titleRotary instrument or piezoelectric for the removal of third molars: a meta-analysis
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage21
local.citation.issue1
local.citation.spage13
local.citation.volume16
local.description.resumoAim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare, in the lower third molar surgery, the osteotomy techniques with rotary instruments and piezoelectric motors. Methods: An electronic search was conducted using the following databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register. Inclusion criteria were: studies in humans, randomized or nonrandomized, comparing the extraction of third molars that required osteotomy and/or odontosection with rotary instrument and osteotomy and/or odontosection with piezoelectric motor assistance. The analysis and inclusion of articles was performed by two reviewers independently. An evaluation of the quality of articles and data extraction was carried out. Results: From a total of nine hundred seventy four (974) trials, eleven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and seven were included in the quantitative analysis. Rotary instruments were faster than the piezoelectric surgery (95 % CI 0.34 to 1.16). The piezoelectric surgery showed better results when compared with roatry instruments when trismus was assessed in 2 (95 % CI 0.65 to 1.69), 3 (95 % CI 0.63 to 1.67) and 5 (95 % CI 0.03 to 2.26) days after surgery. Seven days after surgery, there were no differences between the techniques (95 % CI (−0.022) to (−1.49)). Conclusion: The piezoelectric surgery was effective in reducing pain, swelling and trismus in third molar surgery, but the same requires greater surgical time than the rotary instruments.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12663-016-0938-y

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG