Reconhecimento da totalidade essencial do princípio de semelhança na promoção de saúde de mulheres em situação de violência e vulnerabilidade

Abstract

Violence is incompatible to social equality. It fosters vulnerability and exclusion of subjects, individual or collective. Its approach requires participation of all, which involves society in general. In order to face the inequality resulting from the objectifying process that violates the human, it is demanded by the praxis of autonomy and consequent recognition among subjects. For the principle of similarity, the notion of vital impulse corresponds to that the praxis of autonomy is governed by participatory assimilation. It realizes health organically. The principle of similarity expresses the natural need for an agreement that unites diversity in essential totality. As a foundation of conjugation he acts in natural friendship, equating individuals by the power to bring together and reunite, through collective embraces. The force of participation brings together the fragmentation, promotes health and solve violence. With this, conciliation and retraction alleviate oppression, liberating humanizing praxis. Participation implies itself with the conformation of essential organic units by totalizing diversities through ideal agreement. It means adequacy or reconciliation between one and multiple. The principle of similarity or participation guides the vital praxis to make agreements in solidarity life and welcoming diversities. The objective is to recognize the Essential Wholeness of the Principle of Similarity as health promotion of women in situation of violence and vulnerability. The study consisted of a qualitative approach, whose methodology was composed of in-depth interviews with women in situations of violence attended at the Outpatient Clinic / Promotion of Women's Health in Situation of Violence and Vulnerability / HC / UFMG and participant observation on the wheels of conversation from the same outpatient clinic. The analysis was based on the Thematic-Categorical Content Analysis technique. It was found that conversation wheels correspond to assimilative scopes that unite different subjects, making totalizations in continuous transformation. In this way, the principle of similarity consists in the natural need to be one and multiple. Wheels of conversation favors the equalization of singularities and development of autonomies. This is how the loving consensus of the essential totality expresses the principle of similarity. In the participatory equalization, the host makes and renews sets, reconciling diverses, inspiring measures and promoting health. In egalitarian participation there is no other domain than the force of rational agreement and, consequently, there is no violence. To the extent that particularization represents oppression and suffering, generalization represents participation, liberation, and revitalization. The particularization isolates and violate. Conversation wheels provide universalization to the subjects of dialogue. As new inclusions are realized, more similar subjects are collectivized. This unification is analogous to the natural model with which the essential totality manifests the principle of similarity. As conversation wheels represent the dynamic place where the vital praxis meets the best conditions for health promotion and the principle of similarity to take place, it is acceptable that by virtue of that encounter both share a close conjugation and that the essential totality of the principle of similarity can contribute to thinking, elaborating and updating health promotion.