Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/40532
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLuciano Dos Santos Rodriguespt_BR
dc.creatorAna Cristina Araujo Pintopt_BR
dc.creatorJoyce da Cruz Ferraz Dutrapt_BR
dc.creatorRenata Rodrigues Sampaiopt_BR
dc.creatorStella Rubim de Sousapt_BR
dc.creatorIsrael Jose da Silvapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T21:40:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-28T21:40:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.citation.volume38pt_BR
dc.citation.issue6pt_BR
dc.citation.spage3705pt_BR
dc.citation.epage3714pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n6p3705pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1679-0359pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/40532-
dc.description.abstractO objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o sistema de tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura, constituído de reator anaeróbio de chicanas (RAC), seguido por reator anaeróbio de manta de lodo (UASB), em escala real. O sistema foi monitorado por meio da análise de amostras coletadas nos afluentes e efluentes do RAC e UASB. Foram analisados os seguintes parâmetros: temperatura, pH, sólidos suspensos totais (SST), sólidos suspensos voláteis (SSV), demanda bioquímica de oxigênio (DBO) e demanda química de oxigênio (DQO). As médias de remoção total de DQO e de DBO foram 96,7 e 98,4%, respectivamente. As concentrações médias de DQO, DBO, SST e SSV no efluente final foram 611, 124, 138 e 134 mg.L-1, respectivamente. As cargas orgânicas volumétricas (COV) médias no RAC e UASB foram 10,29 e 0,99 kgDQO m kgDQO m-3d-1. Desta maneira, o sistema RAC-UASB apresenta-se como alternativa promissora para o tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoThe purpose of this study was to assess the swine wastewater treatment system, consisting of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), followed by the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor at full scale. The system was monitored by analyzing samples collected in the influent and effluent of ABR and UASB. The following parameters were analyzed: temperature, pH, total suspended solids (TSS), volatile suspended solids (VSS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Averages of total removal of COD and BOD were 96.7 and 98.4%, respectively. The mean concentrations of COD, BOD, TSS, and VSS at the final effluent were 611, 124, 138, and 134 mg L-1, respectively. The mean volumetric organic loadings (VOL) at the ABR and UASB were 10.29 and 0.99 kg COD m-1d-1. Therefore, the ABR-UASB system was found to be a promising alternative for the swine wastewater treatmentpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentVET - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA PREVENTIVApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofSemina: Ciências Agráriaspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subject.otherDejetos animaispt_BR
dc.subject.otherDigestão anaeróbiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherImpacto ambientalpt_BR
dc.titleSwine wastewater treatment using an anaerobic baffled (ARB) and a uasb reactor systempt_BR
dc.title.alternativeSistema reator anaeróbio de chicanas - reator UASB no tratamento de efluentes de suinoculturapt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/24637/22276pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017_Swine wastewater treatment using an anaerobic baffled (arb) and a uasb reactor system.pdf818.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.