Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42046
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPedro Guilherme Lemes Alvespt_BR
dc.creatorJosé Cola Zanunciopt_BR
dc.creatorJosé Eduardo Serrãopt_BR
dc.creatorSimon A. Lawsonpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T16:45:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T16:45:16Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10-22-
dc.citation.volume24pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1283pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1295pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-016-7729-3pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/42046-
dc.description.resumoThe Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) was the first non-governmental organization composed of multi-stakeholders to ensure the social, environmental, and economic sustainability of forest resources. FSC prohibits certain chemicals and active ingredients in certified forest plantations. A company seeking certification must discontinue use of products so listed and many face problems to comply with these constraints. The aim of this study was to assess the impacts of certification on pest management from the perspective of Brazilian private forestry sector. Ninety-three percent of Brazilian FSC-certified forest companies rated leaf-cutting ants as “very important” pests. Chemical control was the most important management technique used and considered very important by 82 % of respondents. The main chemical used to control leaf-cutting ants, sulfluramid, is in the derogation process and was classified as very important by 96.5 % of the certified companies. Certified companies were generally satisfied in relation to FSC certification and the integrated management of forest pests, but 27.6 % agreed that the prohibitions of pesticides for leaf-cutting ant and termite control could be considered as a non-tariff barrier on high-productivity Brazilian forest plantations. FSC forest certification has encouraged the implementation of more sustainable techniques and decisions in pest management in forest plantations in Brazil. The prohibition on pesticides like sulfluramid and the use of alternatives without the same efficiency will result in pest mismanagement, production losses, and higher costs. This work has shown that the application of global rules for sustainable forest management needs to adapt to each local reality.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentICA - INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIASpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subject.otherPesticidas - Aplicaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherProdutos químicos agrícolaspt_BR
dc.subject.otherManejo florestalpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPragas florestaispt_BR
dc.subject.otherTermitapt_BR
dc.subject.otherFormiga-cortadeirapt_BR
dc.subject.otherSustentabilidade e meio ambientept_BR
dc.titleForest Stewardship Council (FSC) pesticide policy and integrated pest management in certified tropical plantationspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-016-7729-3pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.