Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42631
Type: Artigo de Periódico
Title: Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections
Other Titles: Procalcitonina para iniciar ou descontinuar antibióticos em infecções agudas do trato respiratório
Authors: Philipp Schuetz
Jean Chastre
Florence Tubach
Kristina Kristoffersen
Olaf Burkhardt
Tobias Welte
Stefan Schroeder
Vandack Nobre
Long Wei
Heiner Bucher
Neera Bhatnagar
Yannick Wirz
Djillali Annane
Konrad Reinhart
Angela Branche
Pierre Damas
Maarten Nijsten
Dylan de Lange
Rodrigo o Deliberato
Stella Lima
Vera Maravi'-stojkovi'
Alessia Verduri
Ramon Sager
Bin Cao
Yahya Shehabi
Albertus Beishuizen
Jens-ulrik Jensen
Caspar Corti
Jos a Van Oers
Ann Falsey
Evelien de Jong
Carolina Ferreira de Oliveira
Bianca Beghe
Mirjam Christ-crain
Matthias Briel
Beat Mueller
Daiana Stolz
Michael Tamm
Lila Bouadma
Charles e Luyt
Michel Wolff
Abstract: Background Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) comprise of a large and heterogeneous group of infections including bacterial, viral, and other aetiologies. In recent years, procalcitonin (PCT), a blood marker for bacterial infections, has emerged as a promising tool to improve decisions about antibiotic therapy (PCT‐guided antibiotic therapy). Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the feasibility of using procalcitonin for starting and stopping antibiotics in different patient populations with ARIs and different settings ranging from primary care settings to emergency departments, hospital wards, and intensive care units. However, the effect of using procalcitonin on clinical outcomes is unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review and individual participant data meta‐analysis first published in 2012 designed to look at the safety of PCT‐guided antibiotic stewardship. Objectives The aim of this systematic review based on individual participant data was to assess the safety and efficacy of using procalcitonin for starting or stopping antibiotics over a large range of patients with varying severity of ARIs and from different clinical settings. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE, and Embase, in February 2017, to identify suitable trials. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing trials in April 2017. Selection criteria We included RCTs of adult participants with ARIs who received an antibiotic treatment either based on a procalcitonin algorithm (PCT‐guided antibiotic stewardship algorithm) or usual care. We excluded trials if they focused exclusively on children or used procalcitonin for a purpose other than to guide initiation and duration of antibiotic treatment. Data collection and analysis Two teams of review authors independently evaluated the methodology and extracted data from primary studies. The primary endpoints were all‐cause mortality and treatment failure at 30 days, for which definitions were harmonised among trials. Secondary endpoints were antibiotic use, antibiotic‐related side effects, and length of hospital stay. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, and clinical diagnosis using a fixed‐effect model. The different trials were added as random‐effects into the model. We conducted sensitivity analyses stratified by clinical setting and type of ARI. We also performed an aggregate data meta‐analysis. Main results From 32 eligible RCTs including 18 new trials for this 2017 update, we obtained individual participant data from 26 trials including 6708 participants, which we included in the main individual participant data meta‐analysis. We did not obtain individual participant data for four trials, and two trials did not include people with confirmed ARIs. According to GRADE, the quality of the evidence was high for the outcomes mortality and antibiotic exposure, and quality was moderate for the outcomes treatment failure and antibiotic‐related side effects. Primary endpoints: there were 286 deaths in 3336 procalcitonin‐guided participants (8.6%) compared to 336 in 3372 controls (10.0%), resulting in a significantly lower mortality associated with procalcitonin‐guided therapy (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99, P = 0.037). We could not estimate mortality in primary care trials because only one death was reported in a control group participant. Treatment failure was not significantly lower in procalcitonin‐guided participants (23.0% versus 24.9% in the control group, adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01, P = 0.068). Results were similar among subgroups by clinical setting and type of respiratory infection, with no evidence for effect modification (P for interaction > 0.05). Secondary endpoints: procalcitonin guidance was associated with a 2.4‐day reduction in antibiotic exposure (5.7 versus 8.1 days, 95% CI ‐2.71 to ‐2.15, P < 0.001) and lower risk of antibiotic‐related side effects (16.3% versus 22.1%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.82, P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay and intensive care unit stay were similar in both groups. A sensitivity aggregate‐data analysis based on all 32 eligible trials showed similar results. Authors' conclusions This updated meta‐analysis of individual participant data from 12 countries shows that the use of procalcitonin to guide initiation and duration of antibiotic treatment results in lower risks of mortality, lower antibiotic consumption, and lower risk for antibiotic‐related side effects. Results were similar for different clinical settings and types of ARIs, thus supporting the use of procalcitonin in the context of antibiotic stewardship in people with ARIs. Future high‐quality research is needed to confirm the results in immunosuppressed patients and patients with non‐respiratory infections.
Subject: Procalcitonina
Antibióticos
Infecções
Trato respiratório
language: eng
metadata.dc.publisher.country: Brasil
Publisher: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Publisher Initials: UFMG
metadata.dc.publisher.department: MED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA MÉDICA
Rights: Acesso Aberto
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd007498.pub3
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42631
Issue Date: 2017
metadata.dc.url.externa: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007498.pub3/full
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: Cochrane library
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.