Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/50647
Type: Artigo de Periódico
Title: Comparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery
Authors: Mohamad Nagibou Wadi
Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas
Daniel Salvatore Freitas
Rodrigo Hermont Cançado
Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira
Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira
Guilherme Janson
Fabricio Pinelli Valarelli
Abstract: Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the profile attractiveness between orthodontic camouflage of the Class III malocclusion and the predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery evaluated by dentists and laypeople. Settings and sample population. The sample consisted of 21 patients (9 male; 12 female) with Class III malocclusion treated with orthodontic camouflage and Class III intermaxillary elastics. Material and Methods. The mean initial age of the patients was 24.38 years (SD 3.32), and the mean ANB angle was −1.91° (SD 0.83°). Patients presented skeletal Class III and normal growth patterns. Initial and final lateral cephalograms of each patient were used. The initial cephalogram was used to perform the treatment simulation of orthognathic surgery, and its silhouette was compared to the silhouette obtained from the final cephalogram after Class III orthodontic camouflage. A subjective analysis of profile attractiveness was performed by 47 laypeople and 60 dentists, with scores from 1 (less attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare profile attractiveness between the orthodontic treatment and the predictive tracing groups and between dentists and laypeople. Results. The predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery showed to be statistically significantly more attractive (mean score 4.57, SD 2.47) than that of the Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment (mean score 4.22, SD 2.40), with a mean numerical but significant difference of 0.35 (SD 2.01) (). Laypeople were more critical than dentists in evaluating profile attractiveness, but numerical difference between the groups was also small. Conclusion. The profile silhouette of predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery showed to be more attractive than that of Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment; however, differences were small but statistically significant. Laypeople showed to be more critical than dentists.
Subject: Orthodontics
Malocclusion angle class iii
Orthognathic surgery
language: eng
metadata.dc.publisher.country: Brasil
Publisher: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Publisher Initials: UFMG
metadata.dc.publisher.department: FAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
FAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
Rights: Acesso Aberto
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083940
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/50647
Issue Date: 7-Sep-2020
metadata.dc.url.externa: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2020/7083940/
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: International Journal of Dentistry
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.