1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55576
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorOlivia Biermannpt_BR
dc.creatorTanja Kuchenmüllerpt_BR
dc.creatorUlysses de Barros Panissetpt_BR
dc.creatorMark Leyspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T21:32:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-29T21:32:09Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-15-
dc.citation.volume23pt_BR
dc.citation.issue2pt_BR
dc.citation.spage120pt_BR
dc.citation.epage133pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJHG-12-2017-0063pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn20594631pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/55576-
dc.description.resumoPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to better understand facilitators’ perceived role and influence on a policy dialogue’s (PD) process and impact. PDs enable interactions between policy makers,researchers and other stakeholders – one of the factors associated with promoting evidence-informed policy making.Design/methodology/approach – This is an exploratory study based on semi-structured interviews with ten key informants from sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, North and South America. Participants were purposefully sampled based on their experience in facilitating or observing PDs organized by the WHO’s Evidence-informed Policy Network. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. Findings – A successful PD relies on a structured process used to catalyze impact. Facilitators contribute to a successful PD through their facilitation skills, for example, helping to get to an informed judgment; knowledge, for example, about the health system; attitudes, for example, valuing the PD process over its outcomes; and personal attributes, for example, credibility. Facilitators’ involvement in preparatory and follow-up actions are equally paramount for a PD’s success. Challenges in implementing PDs can be prevented/attenuated, for example, through stakeholder analysis to identify suitable PD participants, and anticipate power constellations or potential conflicts.Research limitations/implications – Research should focus on the overall process of a PD – especially on preparation and follow-up activities and their influence on a PD’s success. Originality/value – Informed by harnessing practical experiences, this paper outlines facilitators’ skills, attributes, attitudes, knowledge and how these can be used to influence a PD’s successpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIALpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Health Governance-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectTrainingpt_BR
dc.subjectGovernance structurespt_BR
dc.subjectHealth policypt_BR
dc.subjectLeadershippt_BR
dc.subjectPublic healthpt_BR
dc.subjectEvidence-based practicept_BR
dc.subject.otherEducaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherPolítica de Saúdept_BR
dc.subject.otherLiderançapt_BR
dc.subject.otherSaúde Públicapt_BR
dc.subject.otherPrática Clínica Baseada em Evidênciaspt_BR
dc.titlePolicy dialogues: facilitators perceived role and influencept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHG-12-2017-0063/full/htmlpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.