Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/57501
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLeonardo Victor Silva Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorTiago de Freitas Paulinopt_BR
dc.creatorRamon de Paoli Mendespt_BR
dc.creatorLuiz Machadopt_BR
dc.creatorWillian Moreira Duartept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-05T00:31:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-05T00:31:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-05-
dc.citation.issue22pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage19pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.29327/xxiiconemi.563616pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2764-4294pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/57501-
dc.description.abstractThere is a global schedule to reduce/ban various refrigerants, due to environmental impacts. There is a global schedule to reduce/ban various refrigerants, due to environmental impacts.However, most refrigeration and air conditioning units in developing countries, such as Brazil, operate with R22. In order to reuse this equipment, it is interesting to evaluate alternative fluids that, with some modifications in the system, make it possible to reuse them. As a result, this work compared the COP during one year of a split-type air conditioning system using R-410A and R-290, as well as TEWI for both fluids. For this, a mathematical model developed in the Equation Engineering Solver (EES) was used, encompassing the system components and the thermal zone. Additionally, climatic variations and their impacts on the evaluated enclosure were also considered. Through this study, it was possible to verify that R-290, when compared to R410A, presented, on average, a 44% higher COP, with a 45% lower refrigerant charge, in addition to a 77% lower TEWI. These values suggest that, from the point of view of performance and environmental impact (TEWI), R-290 is a very interesting alternative to R-410A as a replacement for these existing equipment and even for new systems. However, most refrigeration and air conditioning units in developing countries, such as Brazil, operate with R22. In order to reuse this equipment, it is interesting to evaluate alternative fluids that, with some modifications in the system, make it possible to reuse them. As a result, this work compared the COP during one year of a split-type air conditioning system using R-410A and R-290, as well as TEWI for both fluids. For this, a mathematical model developed in the Equation Engineering Solver (EES) was used, encompassing the system components and the thermal zone. Additionally, climatic variations and their impacts on the evaluated enclosure were also considered. Through this study, it was possible to verify that R-290, when compared to R410A, presented, on average, a 44% higher COP, with a 45% lower refrigerant charge, in addition to a 77% lower TEWI. These values suggest that, from the point of view of performance and environmental impact (TEWI), R-290 is a very interesting alternative to R-410A as a replacement for these existing equipment and even for new systems.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoHá um cronograma global para redução/banimento de diversos fluidos refrigerantes, em função de impactos ambientais. Entretanto, grande parte das unidades de refrigeração e climatização em países em desenvolvimento, como o Brasil, operam com o R-22. Com o intuito de reaproveitar esses equipamentos, é interessante avaliar fluidos alternativos que, com algumas modificações no sistema, possibilitem reaproveitalos. Em função disso, este trabalho comparou o COP durante um ano de um sistema de ar condicionado do tipo split utilizando o R-410A e o R-290, bem como o TEWI para ambos os fluidos. Para isso, foi utilizado um modelo matemático desenvolvido no Equation Engineering Solver (EES), englobando os componentes do sistema e a zona térmica. Adicionalmente, foram consideradas também as variações climáticas e os seus impactos nesse recinto avaliado. Por meio desse estudo, foi possível constatar que o R-290, quando comparado ao R-410A apresentou, em média, um COP 44% maior, com uma carga de refrigerante 45% menor, além de um TEWI 77% menor. Esses valores sugerem que, analisando do ponto de vista de desempenho e impacto ambiental (TEWI), o R-290 é uma alternativa bem interessante para o R-410A como substituto nesses equipamentos já existentes e mesmo para novos sistemas.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentENG - DEPARTAMENTO DE ENGENHARIA MECÂNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectR-290,pt_BR
dc.subjectR-410Apt_BR
dc.subjectModelo matemáticopt_BR
dc.subjectAr condicionadopt_BR
dc.subject.otherEngenharia mecânicapt_BR
dc.subject.otherModelos matemáticospt_BR
dc.subject.otherAr condicionadopt_BR
dc.titleEstudo comparativo de um ar condicionado convencional utilizando um fluido refrigerante alternativo ao R-410A para aplicação em escritóriospt_BR
dc.title.alternativeComparative study of a conventional air conditioner using different refrigerant as an alternative for R-410Apt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Eventopt_BR
dc.url.externahttp://dx.doi.org/10.29327/xxiiconemi.563616pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Evento

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DE UM AR CONDICIONADO CONVENCIONAL UTILIZANDO UM FLUIDO - PDFA.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.