1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/68004
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJohn Rivapt_BR
dc.creatorMeha Bhattpt_BR
dc.creatorDavid Brunarskipt_BR
dc.creatorJason Bussept_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorFeng Xiept_BR
dc.creatorHolger Schünemannpt_BR
dc.creatorJan Brozekpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T19:07:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-30T19:07:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.citation.volume136pt_BR
dc.citation.spage203pt_BR
dc.citation.epage215pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.018pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1878-5921pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/68004-
dc.description.resumoObjective: Little is known about how developers and panel members report cost and cost effectiveness considerations in GRADE guideline Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. A systematic survey was conducted to explore approaches and factors contributing to variability in economic information reporting. Study Design and Setting: Guideline organization websites were systematically searched to create a convenience sample of guidelines. Reviewers screened published EtD frameworks and generated frequencies of reporting approaches. We used thematic analysis to summarize factors related to variability of economic information reporting. Results: We included 142 guidelines. The overall rate of reporting economic information was high (91%); however, there was variability across completion of predefined EtD Likert-type judgments (70%), noting information as not identified across EtD framework domains (57%), and providing remarks to justify recommendations (38%). Six themes contributing to variability emerged, related to: intervention, population, payor, provider, healthcare resource use, and economic model building factors. Only 2 guidelines performed a GRADE certainty appraisal of economic outcomes. Conclusion: Completing predefined EtD Likert-type judgments, specifically reporting a literature review approach, study selection criteria and economic model building limitations, as well as linking these to recommendation justification remarks are potential areas for improved use, adoption and adaptation of recommendation, and transparency of GRADE EtD frameworks.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiology-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysispt_BR
dc.subjectEconomicspt_BR
dc.subjectHealth care costspt_BR
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicinept_BR
dc.subjectPractice guidelinespt_BR
dc.subjectEpidemiological research designpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCost-benefit analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherEconomicspt_BR
dc.subject.otherHealth care costspt_BR
dc.subject.otherEvidence-based medicinept_BR
dc.subject.otherPractice guidelinept_BR
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologic research designpt_BR
dc.titleGuidelines that use the GRADE approach often fail to provide complete economic information for recommendations: a systematic surveypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(21)00141-4/fulltextpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.