Uma leitura para a BNCC: de qual currículo e de qual geografia estamos falando?

Abstract

The present work has as its object of analysis the National Common Curricular Base -BNCC in the final years of elementary school and its interface with Geography. We assume as a focus of questioning the constitution of a curricular discourse articulated with two prominent elements in the policy under debate, which are the projected meanings on the names competences and national that try to define behavioral, disciplinary and homogenizing referrals on Geography. In this investigation, we use a discursive perspective, especially in the Foucauldian discussion about discourse, truth and power, in which it is possible to problematize the constitution of discursive hegemonies in the politics of the BNCC. In the articulated analysis between curricular policies and Geography, we seek in dialogue with actors from the disciplinary community to argue that the negligent and emptying character that characterizes the proposal for Geography in the Final Years of Elementary School is an effect of a curricular policy centered on a watertight notion, homogeneous and limiting on a national scale training project for competent subjects.